How many pounds overweight is sexiest ?

[Stevefezzik]

I'm about 70 lbs overweight myself, I like a woman to be at least 40 lbs overweight, and consider 60-100 lbs over to be fine, even 150 over ( or about 300lbs).

Beyond that fat starts to become too fat and gross, IMO

350 maybe, but not 500lbs.

I think the first hundred pounds ( even 150) of fat are sexy, and it starts to lose appeal after that.

A BBW that claims to weigh 370, can turn me on, but that's the max for me, at this point.

[bbwrayne]

You shouldn't let a number limit you on what you like in a woman. I am over 370 and find myself attractive. You should go with what is a appealing to your eye and not a number so to say. Your missing out on some wonderful beautiful women out there then.

[LillyBBBW]

What Rayne said. Be prepared to get high kicked in the jaw over this. It's ignorant to come to a fat forum and call fat people gross.

But yeah... I'm 374 and gaining and love every inch, so I disagree. What is gloriously supple for one woman may be too much for another. It all depends on the woman, what is heathy for her and how she feels about herself.

Oh but you weren't asking about that were you? You were asking purely from an objectifying male POV to see what is going through the heads of other males like yourself. There might be validation for you if others voice similar sentiments about women weighing xxx pounds. I would strongly recommend against encouraging gang beatings on a board though, both on your part and the part of the pissed off females in retort. Bad idea, poor planning.

[gangstadawg]

i dont have a max number in a womans weight as long as she is mobile and able to get around.

[BothGunsBlazing]

I agree with what the ladies 'ave said so far, but to be serious, I'll try anything out, except one thing in particular grosses me out.

42 yo, male 6-0, 245 lbs, 47" waist,apple belly,very soft

simply too much, grotesque really.

[Tooz]

I'm about 70 lbs overweight myself, I like a woman to be at least 40 lbs overweight, and consider 60-100 lbs over to be fine, even 150 over ( or about 300lbs).

Beyond that fat starts to become too fat and gross, IMO

350 maybe, but not 500lbs.

I think the first hundred pounds ( even 150) of fat are sexy, and it starts to lose appeal after that.

A BBW that claims to weigh 370, can turn me on, but that's the max for me, at this point.

I don't know if you mean for this to come across as objectifying as it does. Talking about a woman in terms of POUNDS OF FAT on her body? I don't know. Furthermore, you aren't thinkin' it through too well-- height, bones and muscles can skew things a fair amount.

Lastly, how many pounds "over" a woman is isn't really your say-- even if your tone dictates you feel otherwise.

[Wagimawr]

I don't think he knows the difference.

Look at jerkass's threads - fat this, curves this, bulges that - great things, but NOT when you completely ignore the WOMAN underneath/behind/[insert preposition here].

Remind me again why we're being reasonable? :p Guys like this are the reason men have a bad rep.

[Tad]

I'm about 70 lbs overweight myself, I like a woman to be at least 40 lbs overweight, and consider 60-100 lbs over to be fine, even 150 over ( or about 300lbs).

Beyond that fat starts to become too fat and gross, IMO

350 maybe, but not 500lbs.

I think the first hundred pounds ( even 150) of fat are sexy, and it starts to lose appeal after that.

A BBW that claims to weigh 370, can turn me on, but that's the max for me, at this point.

What possible benefit did you see to posting this? Seriously, I understand that people have their preferences, but stating so clinically what they are, saying things not meeting your preferences are gross.....I really am curious in what light this looked like a good idea, because I'm just not seeing it.

[Jes]

fat and gross, indeed.

[imfree]

I'm about 70 lbs overweight myself, I like a woman to be at least 40 lbs overweight, and consider 60-100 lbs over to be fine, even 150 over ( or about 300lbs).

Beyond that fat starts to become too fat and gross, IMO

350 maybe, but not 500lbs.

I think the first hundred pounds ( even 150) of fat are sexy, and it starts to lose appeal after that.

A BBW that claims to weigh 370, can turn me on, but that's the max for me, at this point.

A woman with just 20-30 lbs of "extra" fat is a
wonderful hug and a great cuddle. "Adversity
builds character", my pastor says, and many
of us "fat and gross" people have more spirit
and character than you'll ever know what to
do with!

[Ernest Nagel]

Just for the record the simple use of the term overweight is pretty biased, imo. What weight is that "over", then? Average? The typical way of describing something higher than average would be above average, not over average. Someone weighs whatever they weigh. That will be more than some, less than others but that isn't really a very useful context for comparison/classification. Since body size is fundamentally a subjective, personal issue maybe we should view it in terms of individual satisfaction? Happyweight or unhappyweight? Not that weight should even factor into general happiness but is your weight OK for you? If so, that's the operative variable. JMO.

And if sexiness were quantifiable in any such simplistic way for someone I can only take it as a hopeful sign from responses here that such a person's reproductive opportunities would be severely limited. :D

[Tooz]

I don't think he knows the difference.

Look at jerkass's threads - fat this, curves this, bulges that - great things, but NOT when you completely ignore the WOMAN underneath/behind/[insert preposition here].

Remind me again why we're being reasonable? :p Guys like this are the reason men have a bad rep.

I did read his other posts. I was honestly aghast.

[imfree]

...............snipped.....................

And if sexiness were quantifiable in any such simplistic way for someone I can only take it as a hopeful sign from responses here that such a person's reproductive opportunities would be severely limited. :D

Good point, Ernest, I'll go so far as to say that such
a person could also have an above-average likelihood
of winning a Darwin Award, as well.

[Minerva_08]

It's really not fair to put down women if they are "X" about the weight limit for you.

I know of a few women who are bigger than 370 and *to me* they are just delicious! Infact, I am a bit jealous of the women who can make 370 look awe-inspiring and I struggle at 260, ya know? It really is all about confidence.

[Tooz]

Plus, I wonder what would happen if someone at the "maximum" gained a pound.

"Oh, oh...371! SORRY, TIME TO BREAK UP. I LOST WOOD."

[Neen]

Plus, I wonder what would happen if someone at the "maximum" gained a pound.

"Oh, oh...371! SORRY, TIME TO BREAK UP. I LOST WOOD."

HAHAHAHA classic!

[pat70327]

Plus, I wonder what would happen if someone at the "maximum" gained a pound.

"Oh, oh...371! SORRY, TIME TO BREAK UP. I LOST WOOD."

haha, I hope that never happens around here... but I gotta go with the girls on this one... you can't just base things on a number, and personally I haven't seen any women that were "too fat" to be attractive, and you totally forgot about height 4foot10 370 vs. 6foot2 370... big difference

[LoveBHMS]

I agree with what the ladies 'ave said so far, but to be serious, I'll try anything out, except one thing in particular grosses me out.

42 yo, male 6-0, 245 lbs, 47" waist,apple belly,very soft

simply too much, grotesque really.

I hate my time machine for not existing yet.

I need to work harder at this.

[love dubh]

Harder at what? SHE WANTS TO KNOW.

[LoveBHMS]

Harder at what? SHE WANTS TO KNOW.

Harder at building my time machine so I can go back to being 22.

(Have previously referenced the time machine i've been trying to build.)

Then I just have to gain 100 pounds and skulk around North Jersey or wherever BGB is likely to be.

[Ernest Nagel]

The OP really got me to thinking here. In reality one-dimensional objects cannot exist. It's a simple, physical reality. How are one-dimensional people possible?!? :p

[BothGunsBlazing]

I hate my time machine for not existing yet.

I need to work harder at this.

Hey, you picked up on what I was referring to! You rock! :bow::bow: Although, I can't really blame people for not wanting to open this dudes profile. haha

[LoveBHMS]

Hey, you picked up on what I was referring to! You rock! :bow::bow: Although, I can't really blame people for not wanting to open this dudes profile. haha

<------ Hobbies include mocking others.

Ask anyone who knows me. I can mock for days.

[Wild Zero]

How many threads from this OP is sexist?

[AnnMarie]

Harder at building my time machine so I can go back to being 22.



I didn't finish mine - didn't stop me. ;)

[love dubh]

The OP really got me to thinking here. In reality one-dimensional objects cannot exist. It's a simple, physical reality. How are one-dimensional people possible?!? :p

We all live in Flatland now?! :eek::eek:

[autopaint-1]

Over what weight? The most important numbers when it comes to a good relationship are the IQ numbers.

[Famouslastwords]

Over what weight? The most important numbers when it comes to a good relationship are the IQ numbers.

Oh boy, I'm in trouble then!









j/k, really

[liz (di-va)]

39219I'm fat and gross!

THANKS FOR CLEARING THAT UP STOP WOULD NOT HAVE KNOWN WITHOUT
YOUR HELPFUL INFORMATION STOP IS NOW CLEAR THAT I AM THE WRONG
WEIGHT STOP WILL TAKE EFFORTS TO RECTIFY STOP THANKS AGAIN STOP

[GordoNegro]

Everyone is entitled to their own preference; though because someone may be too big or small for one's tastes doesn't mean their unattractive, just that you personally do not find that person attractive.
Honestly if a woman has a great love of self, I think that is sexiest above all.

[Totmacher]

The only appropriate answer is, "all of them" . So that's mine.

[furious styles]

We all live in Flatland now?! :eek::eek:

omfg i was about to post the same thing. i loves flatland.

[Flyin Lilac]

*Raises hand*

Hi, I'm Becky, and I'm "fat and gross."


(this is everyone's cue to yell, "HI, BECKY!")

[Wild Zero]

So can we have a vote on whether or not immobility due to being a flat object is hot or not? Cause I can totally get sprung for the flat dots that are 3 to 4 feet in diameter or maybe even 4 and a half feet but anything above 4 and a half is fat and gross.

[love dubh]

So can we have a vote on whether or not immobility due to being a flat object is hot or not? Cause I can totally get sprung for the flat dots that are 3 to 4 feet in diameter or maybe even 4 and a half feet but anything above 4 and a half is fat and gross.

Mr. Edwin A. Abbott would like a word with you, good sir!

He advises that such a dot sound a "peace-cry" and sway back and forth in her ambulations so as not to stab anyone.

[shin_moyseku]

Personally, i dont think numbrs its like the problem in being sexy or not, we just have to look around and see how many women here (i hope all of them) are sexy and dont have the same weight, from 10 lbs extra to a unknown mumber of pounds they are sexy, i love this site for that because women here are all beautiful and all of them know how to be sexy in their own ways.


Thanks s much, please vote for me as president of fat-land. thanks, i hate skinny promises and unusefull diet pills , thanks. :bow:

[Dravenhawk]

I never found the upper end of the weight limit for me I don't think one exists

Dravenhawk

[Pookie]

Hmm... I find arrogant men who can only justify their attraction to bigger girls by saying oh but not too big cos thats gross to possibly be one of the more grotesque things I have read.

Very childish I think, the need to justify using numbers and limits, and very insulting to a board filled with women you just called gross.

I not sure I qualify for gross according to your mathematical equations, I dont weight myself in pounds... maybe I need to find out to make sure?

[shin_moyseku]

Hmm... I find arrogant men who can only justify their attraction to bigger girls by saying oh but not too big cos thats gross to possibly be one of the more grotesque things I have read.

Very childish I think, the need to justify using numbers and limits, and very insulting to a board filled with women you just called gross.

I not sure I qualify for gross according to your mathematical equations, I dont weight myself in pounds... maybe I need to find out to make sure?

totally agree with this girl, and i dont think u can be gross no matter how much big u are, this is valid for all the ladies in the forum.

[AJTano]

The OP really got me to thinking here. In reality one-dimensional objects cannot exist. It's a simple, physical reality. How are one-dimensional people possible?!? :p

Can't have two-dimensional objects either.

Over what weight? The most important numbers when it comes to a good relationship are the IQ numbers.

That's kind of close-minded, too. And you have to remember that women have a smaller standard deviation to their IQ, too.

[ripley]

Checking in for the Fat & Gross club!


Hi Liz, Hi Lilac.....please pass the chips and dip. :)

[butch]

No one told me there was a meeting of the Fat and Gross Club? I'm the recording secretary, remember?

[AnnMarie]

Checking in for the Fat & Gross club!


Hi Liz, Hi Lilac.....please pass the chips and dip. :)

He was banned days ago.

[ripley]

So he was a troll! Thanks AM. :)

[olwen]

We all live in Flatland now?! :eek::eek:
That's the book I was thinking of. It was on the tip of my tongue


I don't think he knows the difference.

Look at jerkass's threads - fat this, curves this, bulges that - great things, but NOT when you completely ignore the WOMAN underneath/behind/[insert preposition here].

Remind me again why we're being reasonable? :p Guys like this are the reason men have a bad rep.

I did read his other posts. I was honestly aghast.

This guy's posts are all creepy...I'm not even sure what to make of them. Surely his posts were meant only to be provocative. I can just picture this guy sitting in a cramped dark basement apartment in front of his computer, one hand typing on a sticky keyboard. Trying desperately to find that one pinup girl who's just the right size who can make his "heart" pump, and if you listen closely you can hear a frustrated whimper emanating from his cramp smoke filled dungeon every time he sees one who's off by a pound...I suppose such protracted attempts at self love are enough to make any guy go batty.

[BothGunsBlazing]

That's the book I was thinking of. It was on the tip of my tongue






This guy's posts are all creepy...I'm not even sure what to make of them. Surely his posts were meant only to be provocative. I can just picture this guy sitting in a cramped dark basement apartment in front of his computer, one hand typing on a sticky keyboard. Trying desperately to find that one pinup girl who's just the right size who can make his "heart" pump, and if you listen closely you can hear a frustrated whimper emanating from his cramp smoke filled dungeon every time he sees one who's off by a pound...I suppose such protracted attempts at self love are enough to make any guy go batty.

you really could've just posted this and cut out all that describing. :p

http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y91/NoKissCutsAsDeep/southparkguyhz2.jpg

[olwen]

HA HA HA HA HA HA! That's pretty good, only the rooms not dark. He should be sloppier. Not fat either, but like creepier....the rooms not messy enough...eh, it'll do.

[butch]

you really could've just posted this and cut out all that describing. :p

http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y91/NoKissCutsAsDeep/southparkguyhz2.jpg

He looks awfully close to lots of guys I think are hot. For real.

[Chimpi]

He looks awfully close to lots of guys I think are hot. For real.

Is that because 'fat people look alike'? :doh:

[butch]

Is that because 'fat people look alike'? :doh:

ha ha, well, now that you mention it, I find a lot of fat guys attractive, so maybe all fat people do look alike to me.

[troubadours]

1, 000 lbs pls

[Fascinita]

I think I'm sexiest at plus-60 lbs than my lowest adult weight.

Other people are sexiest at minus-10 lbs than their "ideal" weight (though, what is that?)--I like lankiness.

But really, everyone is sexy in their own way.

Ed: Eeeewwww... I only read the thread name and came in to post, then I went back and read the OP's post. Talk about gross! And completely un-self-aware.

[Ample Pie]

I don't really have a hard and fast rule...or a soft and squishy rule for that matter...but I tend to like women who are over 220 lbs (not a rule, just something I've noticed), no matter how/where they carry it, and men who are very very slim. There again, that isn't a rule; I've had many crushes on bigger guys.

[Sensualbbwcurves]

Plus, I wonder what would happen if someone at the "maximum" gained a pound.

"Oh, oh...371! SORRY, TIME TO BREAK UP. I LOST WOOD."

LOL LOL...frigging funny!!

[bigjayne66]

Good point, Ernest, I'll go so far as to say that such
a person could also have an above-average likelihood
of winning a Darwin Award, as well.

He can gain his Darwin award by being crushed under my 420+lbs,I am considered sexy by some,and those who do not can look the other way...:mad:

[CPProp]

He can gain his Darwin award by being crushed under my 420+lbs,I am considered sexy by some,and those who do not can look the other way...:mad:

You know your beautiful and sexy :smitten: and I hate numbers whether it be lbs or years, its looks, attraction and personality that really count (aggh there must be a other word… count involves numbers LOL)……… matter.. is a better word …..phew.. saved by the dictionary :)

[DitzyBrunette]

LOL LOL...frigging funny!!

Why on Earth would you revive this awful thread? Just stop, please. There's so many wonderful CURRENT topics started by people who aren't assholes - bump those, not this.

[Adrian]

I have discovered over the years that many of my estimates on a woman's weight are very inaccurate. Weight is so dependent upon not just size but, build and height. I tend to judge a woman's size by her apparent dress/blouse size!
I find the size that gets my motor running is a woman who wears a size 28/30 dress or 48/50 blouse. Regardless of height, this size or circumference is approximately what I like best.

[pdesil071189]

This is a really tough question. I really depends on the person who is carrying the weight. Ive seen girls that are in the High 500's that were about 350 if not a little more overweight that I find very attractive but there are some girls up there that just look bad being that much. I myself am 450lbs and about 250lbs overweight. But all in all in my personal opinion Id say a girl from about 5ft to 5ft 6 in tall and between 450 and 550 lbs would be what I would consider the sexiest

[stldpn]

I'm about 70 lbs overweight myself, I like a woman to be at least 40 lbs overweight, and consider 60-100 lbs over to be fine, even 150 over ( or about 300lbs).

Beyond that fat starts to become too fat and gross, IMO


Gross is a really poor choice of words. You should have claimed it as a simple preference. People appear to be much more understanding of that kind of objectification.

For me, mobility and health is the key concern. My gauges of what is too fat and too thin stem from my beliefs about what I am personally able to "deal with" when it comes to a woman's size or shape. Personally I'm also more of a fan of the body features of small bbws and bbw my size (370) and under.

Thing is all of these women making it sound as if you're a bridge troll for being open about your preference. I say that's a shame, especially since many of them are adamant about protecting their own right to "preference." It's too bad you weren't thinner so you fit better into that preference for guys that are ten pounds underweight and lanky. That might actually make this funny...

[mossystate]

Thing is all of these women making it sound as if you're a bridge troll for being open about your preference. I say that's a shame, especially since many of them are adamant about protecting their own right to "preference." It's too bad you weren't thinner so you fit better into that preference for guys that are ten pounds underweight and lanky. That might actually make this funny...

The dude was banned loooooong ago.

I wonder if he was banned because he had a simple preference...

OR

... he said women over a certain weight are " gross " ( not saying that was the only reason he was banned...who knows ).

Why do you think it was a mere poor choice of words. You prefer fat women 370 and smaller. See how your preference is okie-dokie? You do have preferences...and...goodness...you vocalize them! I say we run all the thin/slender people off this site...oh, and the women who prefer thin/slender people. Enjoy your site! I do think it grand that you defend a man like the OP, just to get back at the fat women who like men who do not look like you. I mean...really?

And I like that you do not see the men who did not appreciate the OP. Guess they must just be dudes lookin' to score with teh fat laaaadies.

[DitzyBrunette]

Thing is all of these women making it sound as if you're a bridge troll for being open about your preference. I say that's a shame, especially since many of them are adamant about protecting their own right to "preference."

Um he was a troll. But what I find funny is you're here telling him it is ok to have a preference of not liking really fat chicks but when us fat girls say we aren't attracted to really fat guys, we're wrong. Wtf.

[stldpn]

The dude was banned loooooong ago.

I wonder if he was banned because he had a simple preference...

OR

... he said women over a certain weight are " gross " ( not saying that was the only reason he was banned...who knows ).

Why do you think it was a mere poor choice of words. You prefer fat women 370 and smaller. See how your preference is okie-dokie? You do have preferences...and...goodness...you vocalize them! I say we run all the thin/slender people off this site...oh, and the women who prefer thin/slender people. Enjoy your site! I do think it grand that you defend a man like the OP, just to get back at the fat women who like men who do not look like you. I mean...really?

And I like that you do not see the men who did not appreciate the OP. Guess they must just be dudes lookin' to score with teh fat laaaadies.

Hey sounded like a preference to me. He said he was attracted to one size and not another. That would be fair according to your own assertions, in ya know, that other thread you seem to want to bring up. "EWW gross" was a viable preference, remember? it's not as if I said it's a nice thing to say, it's not as if it's a decent thing to say, but when it's not directed at fat women apparently it's not something you get as concerned about is it?

I didn't comment on his banning in fact it was only after I posted that I noticed just how old this thread was. I was ready to let it go but apparently you aren't.
Actually the posts I skimmed were pretty quick to hop on the hang em high bandwagon but that seems to be a pattern with some of the people here.

[Tooz]

smells like sour grapes up in this piece

[stldpn]

Um he was a troll. But what I find funny is you're here telling him it is ok to have a preference of not liking really fat chicks but when us fat girls say we aren't attracted to really fat guys, we're wrong. Wtf.

no actually, I said that if he'd framed his descriptions differently (as mere preference) that would have been well within the bounds of supposedly acceptable conduct.

[mossystate]

Hey sounded like a preference to me. He said he was attracted to one size and not another. That would be fair according to your own assertions, in ya know, that other thread you seem to want to bring up. "EWW gross" was a viable preference, remember? it's not as if I said it's a nice thing to say, it's not as if it's a decent thing to say, but when it's not directed at fat women apparently it's not something you get as concerned about is it?

I didn't comment on his banning in fact it was only after I posted that I noticed just how old this thread was. I was ready to let it go but apparently you aren't.
Actually the posts I skimmed were pretty quick to hop on the hang em high bandwagon but that seems to be a pattern with some of the people here.


lol

Yeah, you thought this guy just used unfortunate language. A fat woman who does the same...you ain't gots the understanding thing going.

I would repeat...for the 50th time...that it's not OK to say fat men are _____ ( fill in with any variety of negative comments, not having anything to do with simple personal preference )...but..I won't........ooops....I just did! lol

You were letting something go by going on about the " adamant women "? Really? That was letting something go? I am beginning to think you have no problem at all with fat women saying rude things ( not the prefernce talk, stldpn ) about fat men. I am beginning to think this is a game and a bet with someone. Either way, not cool.

[stldpn]

lol

Yeah, you thought this guy just used unfortunate language. A fat woman who does the same...you ain't gots the understanding thing going.

I would repeat...for the 50th time...that it's not OK to say fat men are _____ ( fill in with any variety of negative comments, not having anything to do with simple personal preference )...but..I won't........ooops....I just did! lol

You were letting something go by going on about the " adamant women "? Really? That was letting something go? I am beginning to think you have no problem at all with fat women saying rude things ( not the prefernce talk, stldpn ) about fat men. I am beginning to think this is a game and a bet with someone. Either way, not cool.

Umm did I come jerk your chain? I posted. A bet? of what kind? do you read or just read into? Life might become a lot simpler for you if you thought a little less about my motivations and simply responded to a post's contents.

[mossystate]

Umm did I come jerk your chain? I posted. A bet? of what kind? do you read or just read into? Life might become a lot simpler for you if you thought a little less about my motivations and simply responded to a post's contents.

I read lots of posts on this site. Lots. That means I might comment, whether or not any chains are being yanked. It's true. You are simply pissed off with any woman not being physically attracted to you. All those women must be out to demonize and sneer at fat men. All of them. OK. I have commented on content. I realized a while back that there is no point. Let's break it down...Mossytime...stldpn prefers women under 370 pounds...fat women who prefer men who are slender, are judgmental and will hopefully be dumped by those men, because those men are Pretty Playboy Types, and that will show these girls. Plop. See, thing is...the content is not all that complex. Wake me when we get to the next gas station. I have to pee.

[stldpn]

I read lots of posts on this site. Lots. That means I might comment, whether or not any chains are being yanked. It's true. You are simply pissed off with any woman not being physically attracted to you. All those women must be out to demonize and sneer at fat men. All of them. OK. I have commented on content. I realized a while back that there is no point. Let's break it down...Mossytime...stldpn prefers women under 370 pounds...fat women who prefer men who are slender, are judgmental and will hopefully be dumped by those men, because those men are Pretty Playboy Types, and that will show these girls. Plop. See, thing is...the content is not all that complex. Wake me when we get to the next gas station. I have to pee.

What I love is your ability to see things in such a simplistic manner that it reminds me of something a teenager might say about world events. Trouble is it's apparent to me that the chip you're carrying is far larger than mine. I certainly don't follow you around chattering about how horrendously over-judgemental you are of others... You didn't answer my question. Which leads me to believe you're not reading you're just reacting... What kind of bet?

[mossystate]

What I love is your ability to see things in such a simplistic manner that it reminds me of something a teenager might say about world events. Trouble is it's apparent to me that the chip you're carrying is far larger than mine. I certainly don't follow you around chattering about how horrendously over-judgemental you are of others... You didn't answer my question. Which leads me to believe you're not reading you're just reacting... What kind of bet?

I am just glad you love my ability.

And, I know I didn't answer your question. You can now wonder why that is, and be very wrong. I am just glad you told us what you find sexiest...just like all those fat women, before you. Yay for preferences!

:happy:

[stldpn]

I am just glad you love my ability.

And, I know I didn't answer your question. You can now wonder why that is, and be very wrong. I am just glad you told us what you find sexiest...just like all those fat women, before you. Yay for preferences!

:happy:

lol I prefer them breathing and able to get up and fix me a snack afterward, those are the only real criteria. Everything else is kinks.

BTW, I'm guessing you realized after you posted the bet thing that a person with over 1,000 posts most of which you prolly haven't read isn't your garden variety troll either eh?

[mossystate]

See, I knew you would get it wrong.:bow:

[adolan55]

You shouldn't let a number limit you on what you like in a woman. I am over 370 and find myself attractive. You should go with what is a appealing to your eye and not a number so to say. Your missing out on some wonderful beautiful women out there then.

You are RIDICULOUSLY attractive, so I think that right there proves the OP wrong in their need to some how quantify the beauty of a woman. It should be common knowledge that you can't quantify the beauty of a woman (especially the lovely ones on this forum).

[SuperSizedAngie]

Lol, I think any weight on a woman can be sexy, it all just depends on the confidence of the girl and how she carries herself!!

[SuperSizedAngie]

Oh, and also, I'm over 370. Not by too much, but a bit. However, considering how much muscle mass I have from my years of moving furniture, weight training, lift & carry videos, yoga, etc, I easily look like I weigh 50lbs less than I actually do. Also, I'm fairly tall. So what I look like at over 370 is not what other women might look like at my weight. Hmmmm.....

[CastingPearls]

It's funny-I'm just under 400 lbs but people (here and in RL) guess I'm somewhere between mid two hundreds to low threes so I'm thinking it's also not just preference but perception.

[KittyKitten]

Basing people off a number on the scale is kind of well, dumb. 220 lbs on one person would not look the same on another. You have to take into account bone structure, muscle mass, and height.

[KittyKitten]

Gross is a really poor choice of words. You should have claimed it as a simple preference. People appear to be much more understanding of that kind of objectification.

For me, mobility and health is the key concern. My gauges of what is too fat and too thin stem from my beliefs about what I am personally able to "deal with" when it comes to a woman's size or shape. Personally I'm also more of a fan of the body features of small bbws and bbw my size (370) and under.

Thing is all of these women making it sound as if you're a bridge troll for being open about your preference. I say that's a shame, especially since many of them are adamant about protecting their own right to "preference." It's too bad you weren't thinner so you fit better into that preference for guys that are ten pounds underweight and lanky. That might actually make this funny...


I didn't see anything wrong with his post except for the 'gross' part. He could have used more tact. No one should date anyone they are not attracted to. At the end of the day we all have our preferences. I wouldn't date a man who is morbidly obese and in bad health.

[Wagimawr]

I wouldn't date a man who is morbidly obese and in bad health.What about a man who is morbidly obese and in good health?

[stldpn]

What about a man who is morbidly obese and in good health?

well that does open up the discussions about what people consider good health. Is good health low blood pressure, or optimal blood sugar? If so, I'm not always in good health. Is it mobility? Is it not going to the hospital every few months? Good health can be defined several ways. I don't think it's unnatural or wrong for people to want someone who can keep up with them. It's all according to what you want out of the relationship. If you're thin and looking for someone to ride roller coasters with or go hiking with it's unfair for you to date someone who can't or won't be able to do any of that with you and vice versa. If you're both ok with doing your own separate activities great but if not it's highly unfair to both parties.

[KittyKitten]

What about a man who is morbidly obese and in good health?


I prefer men who are slender and/or athletic or Big N husky. I don't really have a type. I would date a man the size of Dan on Roseanne but that is my limit.

[FAdoc]

Will I be considered a shallow and bad person if I admit to finding women (quite a bit) over 400 lbs sexier - everything else equal?

[Lovelyone]

Will I be considered a shallow and bad person if I admit to finding women (quite a bit) over 400 lbs sexier - everything else equal?

Pfffft, like we didn't already know that. :p

[Witch-King]

I will be blunt and honest. +500 ssbbws turn me on the most. Weight lower than that still gets the engine started though.

[seasuperchub84]

I will be blunt and honest. +500 ssbbws turn me on the most. Weight lower than that still gets the engine started though.

Im a gay guy and the thought of being totally overruled by a 600 lb man and im only 400 lbs gets my engine started.

Bigger is better :-) However, Ive encountered a few thinner guys who can still get the fire going, but nothing gets me going like a really confident big guy who loves being fat. :-)

EDIT: also if he is in bad health that is okay too. I am in a relationship for love, not just sex. I just cant date anyone who smokes (its a smell thing).