View Single Post
Old 04-30-2009, 07:17 AM   #6
mergirl
 
mergirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Scotland
Posts: 6,927
mergirl keeps pushing the rep limit!mergirl keeps pushing the rep limit!mergirl keeps pushing the rep limit!mergirl keeps pushing the rep limit!mergirl keeps pushing the rep limit!mergirl keeps pushing the rep limit!mergirl keeps pushing the rep limit!mergirl keeps pushing the rep limit!mergirl keeps pushing the rep limit!mergirl keeps pushing the rep limit!mergirl keeps pushing the rep limit!
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by edx View Post


Thanks for the laugh, that is the funniest thing Iíve read in a while!

But here goes with one that probably manages to be long winded and weird all at once: to me, hugging someone who is fully clothed is much more intimate than seeing them in their underwear (Iím rather touch oriented). This makes me shy about hugging fat people, because it seems far more intimate than should be allowed by good manners, given that Iím totally married. But I worry that fat folk might imagine that Iím grossed out by their bodies and uncomfortable touching them (and yes, around here, in some circles, there are a lot of Ďhugí greetings).
Oh.. i get that totally! I can understand what you are saying but for me clothes can be more sexy than naked as opposed to more intimate. I think especially if the clothes excentuate fat bits!!. I think when people are naked they can seem less fat somehow and maby somehow clothes are some sort of 'fat indicator'. In saying this i do love my lady's body, clothed or naked. I am equally turned on.. though i must admit i have a 'hot spot' for fat spillage and wee peeks of belly, back or cleavage and really appreciate the contours or a nice bra roll or four. erm.. Anyone else?????
mergirl is offline   Reply With Quote