View Single Post
Old 04-13-2007, 04:01 PM   #43
stan_der_man
The Teflon Frog
 
stan_der_man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Born in The Mission, raised on Rt. 66, living in the Squirrel Ghetto, SoCal
Posts: 5,195
stan_der_man has ascended what used to be the highest level.stan_der_man has ascended what used to be the highest level.stan_der_man has ascended what used to be the highest level.stan_der_man has ascended what used to be the highest level.stan_der_man has ascended what used to be the highest level.stan_der_man has ascended what used to be the highest level.stan_der_man has ascended what used to be the highest level.stan_der_man has ascended what used to be the highest level.stan_der_man has ascended what used to be the highest level.stan_der_man has ascended what used to be the highest level.stan_der_man has ascended what used to be the highest level.
Default Just my thoughts...

The thing that makes feederism so intertwined with sexuality is that eating is such a carnal pleasure like sex, it is almost as hedonistic of a pleasure to eat as it is to have sex. You can eat to the point where you make yourself sick and you can have sex to the point where you injure yourself. I think that two people eating and gaining weight together is probably the most sensual thing next to having sex. Two people feeding each other chocolate... what's wrong with that? Feederism, to the point of immobility is simply an extreme form of feederism, just like anything else taken to an extreme; there are consequences that will occur. I don't think there is anything perverse or bad about feederism per se, you can take anything to an extreme and have negative consequences put upon yourself or upon others.

fa_man_stan
__________________
.



"Regardless of who runs the websites and organizations, the cause belongs to all of us.
stan_der_man is offline   Reply With Quote