• Dimensions Magazine is a vibrant community of size acceptance enthusiasts. Our very active members use this community to swap stories, engage in chit-chat, trade photos, plan meetups, interact with models and engage in classifieds.

    Access to Dimensions Magazine is subscription based. Subscriptions are only $29.99/year or $5.99/month to gain access to this great community and unmatched library of knowledge and friendship.

    Click Here to Become a Subscribing Member and Access Dimensions Magazine in Full!

A detriment or a benefit to fat acceptance?

Dimensions Magazine

Help Support Dimensions Magazine:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

As far as possible perceptions towards fat acceptance go, are images such as these...

  • a detriment

  • a benefit

  • are of no effect


Results are only viewable after voting.

stan_der_man

The Teflon Frog
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
5,189
Location
,
This is my first attempt at creating a poll, so forgive me if I totally screw this up... :blush:

This poll is not a critique of these artists works, but more a question about what sort of perception images like these might convey to the "general public" about what Fat Acceptance represents, or perhaps what Dimensions represents. I chose these images from the front page of Dimensions, and these images in particular because they are depictions of exaggerated fatness, presumably fatness to the point of immobility. These aren't the most exaggerated of depictions, but typical in many ways of images often found in "Expansion" sites.

Example images are as follows:

fattv.gif


anne.jpg


fatness2.jpg


ssbbw6c.jpg


The question posed is:

As far as possible perceptions towards fat acceptance go, are images such as these...

1) a detriment

2) a benefit

3) are of no effect
 

Latest posts

Back
Top