• Dimensions Magazine is a vibrant community of size acceptance enthusiasts. Our very active members use this community to swap stories, engage in chit-chat, trade photos, plan meetups, interact with models and engage in classifieds.

    Access to Dimensions Magazine is subscription based. Subscriptions are only $29.99/year or $5.99/month to gain access to this great community and unmatched library of knowledge and friendship.

    Click Here to Become a Subscribing Member and Access Dimensions Magazine in Full!

Search results

Dimensions Magazine

Help Support Dimensions Magazine:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
  1. Delineator

    Why are there so few FFAs?

    I most earnestly protest the implication. :mad:
  2. Delineator

    Why are there so few FFAs?

    In other words, you satisfy my definition. :rolleyes:
  3. Delineator

    Why are there so few FFAs?

    That depends on how you define 'douche bag'(where my definition is likely to differ from yours). Mine involves hard-luck cases(ie. losers) who are hindered by a concern for their 'online' reputation. I'm betting that's a better description of you than me. ;)
  4. Delineator

    Why are there so few FFAs?

    One problem is, I think some people(who should know better, but I digress) are assuming ideal populations with hardy-weinburg proportions(in perfect equilibrium). Of course, such populations are only useful for considering an ideal frame of reference, where evolutionary forces are precisely...
  5. Delineator

    Why are there so few FFAs?

    Yes, for intervals of time. But, my post count is positively anemic compared with yours, so the question is a little ironic coming from the likes of you, wouldn't you say? But be careful what you wish for - you'll miss me when I'm gone(obviously, you haven't set me to ignore yet - I wonder...
  6. Delineator

    Why are there so few FFAs?

    Does that say anything about the availability of FFA who are single and looking(or taken, but looking to trade-up - and I can only speculate on whatever criteria that might entail)? Stick > Carrot.
  7. Delineator

    Why are there so few FFAs?

    I see hot-chicks hooking up with economically mediocre guys all the time(some of them don't even have cars!). Your sarcasm is appreciated.
  8. Delineator

    Why are there so few FFAs?

    That will alter reality only insofar as it changes information of the system. But, this is why the age of enlightenment must be declared a bust - irrational agenda will always prevail over knowledge.
  9. Delineator

    Why are there so few FFAs?

    Then what motivates your line of discourse? But, it really shouldn't be impossible. There is nothing you can demonstrate offline, which you should not be able to summarize online. The veracity of anecdotes are only relevant insofar as they can falsify some fundamental assumption on...
  10. Delineator

    Why are there so few FFAs?

    That's trivial to claim, but justifications are a bitch. Try disputing them with something more than a fallacious ad-hominem.
  11. Delineator

    Why are there so few FFAs?

    Guys can never get enough sex. So, it would make sense that attractive guys would put up online profiles to score easy and convenient sex - they're not there because they're lonely, but rather because they're opportunistic. This can be trivially confirmed through experimentation with fake...
  12. Delineator

    Why are there so few FFAs?

    Which says nothing about evident skewness with respect to male endomorphy(I would argue that guys need only betray a modicum of observable endomorphy to be clustered nearer the extreme of the distribution). By your own admission...
  13. Delineator

    Why are there so few FFAs?

    Don't sweat it. Even the FFAs can't seem to figure out whether they're rare or common, lol. Common is evident. If it's not evident, it's not common.
  14. Delineator

    Why are there so few FFAs?

    But your explanation poses a bit of a logical problem. Why should BHM conclude that women are 'faking' their attraction, without some historical precedence to justify such an expectation? I submit, that if BHM are more apprehensive that women are trying to 'bait' them for a laugh, it...
  15. Delineator

    Why are there so few FFAs?

    So, now you want to argue principles of sexual evolution? :doh: Hey, don't tell it to me - I'm just an impartial observer. And I still don't know what you mean by 'large men'. You're still missing the focus of selection. How can a *neonate* be a competent hunter/forager? If I...
  16. Delineator

    Why are there so few FFAs?

    or optima(look it up). If you're trying to say that there is an absolute minimum threshold for female attractiveness, then yes, I will concede your point. But my (justified) point, is that females are significantly more selective. What do you mean by 'larger men'? So, large men...
  17. Delineator

    Why are there so few FFAs?

    A tendency for evolution to favor large males has *very* little to do with relative hunting/foraging competencies, lol. It has do do with the fact that, under conditions of ecological stress, smaller than average size is correlated with decreased viability - ergo the female preference for...
  18. Delineator

    Why are there so few FFAs?

    Actually, it tends to be very one-sided, precisely because females are 'reproductively limiting'(as you have so conveniently observed). What this means, is that males have a higher reproductive potential, and thus a higher optima mating rate. So, it is an evolutionary optima for males to...
  19. Delineator

    Why are there so few FFAs?

    You may come to re-evaluate that position in a decade or so.
  20. Delineator

    Why are there so few FFAs?

    Since I think everyone in this thread has finally reconciled the truth that genuine FFAs are prohibitively rare, I have an interesting evolutionary explanation as to why. If we consider only conventionally attractive FFA(which does a good job of controlling for opportunity as an obvious...
Back
Top