actually, she's dead-on correct. this isn't a man trolling the streets and scooping up kids into his unmarked van. he would be incapable of that. this is a grown man, a grown, alienated, eccentric pop star whose mansion reprehensible, starstruck parents brought their children to to "stay with" knowingly for days or weeks on end. you'd leave your children with a strange man because he's a millionaire and you've heard of him? these parents enabled him and looked the other way until a couple realized they could take it to an even bigger bank. i'm not at all saying they deserved what they got, but i will say that if you think the kids who spoke up were the only ones touched inappropriately, you've got a lot to learn about money and reprehensible, starstruck parents.WHAT!???
The parents are not blameless, but they are also not THE people to blame. You have this one a little backwards. No, you have it a lot backwards. It's a lot like saying if you get raped whilst wearing a short skirt it is your fault.
and this said, for all the tabloids, rumors and jokes, he remained unconvicted, so evidence was not as obvious as as the court of public opinion took for granted. me? i think he probably touched some kids inappropriately. i doubt he necessarily raped them, but inappropriate touching was likely. jackson was likely damaged far more psychologically by the widespread allegations than any of the plaintiffs were physically.