Yes. I've read those, but I don't know which ones, if any, she's referring to. That's my point.I’m going to have to give in here and say uncle, I do not understand what you are referring to in the first part of your reply.
As for your comments directed toward me:
I do not have a problem with you seeking additional knowledge. I even gave you ideas on where to find that knowledge. One of our fellow Dimmers even found the link for you so you could go to the thread and read literally years of responses to your question.
I do have a problem when you have already decided the answer to your question and will only accept that answer. Then again claim that you don’t understand.
When I say I don't understand something, that means I don't have enough information to make a firm judgment on what it means. I often don't. That doesn't mean I won't share my opinion. I always do that, no matter what, because my kind of opinion is in woefully short supply in public discourse.
But one thing I don't want to ever do is attribute a position to someone that they don't hold. That's a logical fallacy. That's why I ask for more information; so I can make more specific kinds of statements that are relevant to the specific case being talked about, instead of just the big, general ones I usually make.