• Dimensions Magazine is a vibrant community of size acceptance enthusiasts. Our very active members use this community to swap stories, engage in chit-chat, trade photos, plan meetups, interact with models and engage in classifieds.

    Access to Dimensions Magazine is subscription based. Subscriptions are only $29.99/year or $5.99/month to gain access to this great community and unmatched library of knowledge and friendship.

    Click Here to Become a Subscribing Member and Access Dimensions Magazine in Full!

The Australian Thread, or Why I hate Kevin Rudd

Dimensions Magazine

Help Support Dimensions Magazine:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

1300 Class

Pam Poovey's Stunt Double
Joined
Sep 30, 2005
Messages
3,701
Location
South of the Tweed
PRIME Minister Kevin Rudd tonight made an unusual televised address to the nation, outlining his government's latest move to protect Australia from the global financial crisis.
The three-minute address was transmitted around the nation.

The last time a prime minister made such an address was when John Howard decided to send troops to Iraq in March, 2003.

Mr Rudd used the address to try to reassures Australians, just hours after announcing a $10.4 billion Economic Security Strategy.

"Many Australians have become concerned, anxious and even fearful as to the future," he said.

"The truth is that we are going through the worst financial crisis in our lifetime.

"I've described it as the economic equivalent of a national security crisis.

"More than 25 banks around the world have failed, or been bailed out.

"But here in Australia, we have among the best regulated banks, with the best balance sheets, in the world."

He said as prime minister, he would act to ensure the stability of Australia's financial system, but warned the country would not be immune from the crisis impacting around the world.

"In the last few weeks, the global financial crisis has moved into a new and dangerous stage," he said.

"Growth will slow, and unemployment will rise.

"That's why the Government today announced this $10.4 billion Economic Security Strategy to support continued positive growth in the national economy, and to provide practical help to households as well."

Mr Rudd said he wanted the Australian people to be aware of the situation.

"As prime minister, it is my job to level with the Australian people. I don't intend to gild the lily.

There will be tough times ahead," he said.

"But the Government remains determined to take whatever action is necessary in the future to steer the economy through this global financial crisis.

"And I have absolute confidence that as a nation, we will get through these tough times together."
KEVIN Rudd has declared Labor will spend more public money if its $10.4 billion economic pump-priming package announced yesterday fails to insulate Australia against the global financial meltdown.

But economists expect the package, including one-off cash handouts for pensioners, low-income families and first-home buyers, will fuel a six-month spending spree that will sustain economic activity and allow Australia to maintain economic growth.

The Prime Minister delivered a sombre message to the nation last night about the Government's latest response to the financial crisis. It came shortly before the US unveiled plans to spend $US250billion ($360 billion) on shares in its nine biggest banks, following the example set by the British Government.

The Rudd measures are designed to counter weeks of international stock market turmoil and overseas bank collapses now cascading into the real economy, threatening economic growth andjobs.

Warning that history showed the best way to respond to market gyrations was to "act decisively, act responsibly and act early", Mr Rudd laid out his plans to inject into the economy one-off payments worth 1 per cent of the national GDP. But he also said the situation was so grave more action might be required.

"As Prime Minister, it is my jobto level with the Australian people," he said during the televised address last night.

"I don't intend to gild the lily. There will be tough times ahead.

"But the Government remains determined to take whatever action is necessary in the future to steer the economy through this global financial crisis."

Markets had earlier responded enthusiastically to reports of the latest US plans, with the Australian Stock Exchange gaining 3.7per cent yesterday. It has now recovered 9.5 per cent of the ground lost last week, when it plunged almost 16 per cent.

The gains in Australia yesterday were smaller than those in New York, where there was an 11per cent jump, or in Japan, where the share index leapt 14 per cent. The London stock market was up 6 per cent in early trading, and Wall Street early today opened 4 per cent up.

British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who has led the world in the reconstruction effort, said Mr Rudd's spending plans were an example to other world leaders.

Having flagged the moves on Monday, Australian investors did not react to the Government's budget stimulus, with the market steadily losing ground after having shot ahead by 6 per cent in the opening minutes of trade.

Mr Rudd will fund the stimulus package from the Government's 2008-09 budget surplus, predicted in May to reach $22 billion.

It will send billions of dollars into the economy, including $4.8billion via one-off payments to pensioners to tide them over before permanent increases occur next July. Those increases are still being finalised.

Single pensioners will receive $1400 and couples $2100 from December 8, with the payments covering all pension categories and also extending to self-funded retirees who hold commonwealth senior health cards.

Carers will receive $1000 for each person in their care, also from December 8.

And two million families eligible to receive Family Tax Benefit (A) pensions will receive $1000 for each eligible child in their care at a cost of $3.9 billion.

The Government will buttress housing sector activity, doubling the first-home buyer grant to $14,000 and tripling it to $21,000 on newly constructed homes until June 30 next year. The housing measure will cost $1.5 billion.

The Government will also proceed with earlier announced plans to bring forward infrastructure spending to early next year and will spend a further $187 million creating 56,000 more training places in 2008-09.

As news of the package spread to consumers yesterday, Sydney mother of two Jenny McNamara welcomed the largesse and was already planning how to spend her $1000-per-child lump sum payment. "I'll spend it on everyday needs - things like clothes, food and maybe some presents," said Ms McNamara, 31. With her husband Andrew earning $52,000 as a courier driver, and monthly mortgage payments of $1300, the couple rely on annual Centrelink family benefit payments of $6000 to make ends meet.

"Andrew's pay covers everything from mortgage, petrol, rates to food on the table. What we have just gets us through," Ms McNamara said.
As the Opposition pledged its support for the stimulus package, Wayne Swan, who returned to Australia yesterday after weekend talks with international leaders in Washington, said the world had changed fundamentally in recent weeks.

"We are in the midst of the worst financial crisis ever to confront the modern market economy," Mr Swan said.

"The sooner that governments act to protect their people the better."

Mr Swan said Australia was in better economic shape than the rest of the world but could not escape being affected by global events, with the International Monetary Fund predicting zero growth in advanced economies and negative growth in emerging nations.

Economists told The Australian yesterday the package would sustain economic growth over the December and March quarters and was cleverly targeted at low-income earners, who would spend the bonuses quickly.

"We will get a bounce in consumer spending towards the end of this year and early in 2009, and that is when consumer spending would have been under greatest pressure," Macquarie Bank senior economist Brian Redican said.

The mid-year budget update to be published next month is expected to include treasury modelling showing the effect of the stimulus. However Treasury has been influenced by US research showing a boost to budget spending of 1 per cent of GDP produces a similar lift in economic growth.

The US launched a $US150billion budget stimulus package in May, equivalent to 1 per cent of its economy, and Australian treasury officials believe this contributed to the positive growth achieved by the US this year, despite it being the epicentre of the global financial crisis.

Treasury expects the boost to the economy from the spending package will be much greater than from the Reserve Bank's 1 per cent interest rate cut.

A study by Treasury's chief economist David Gruen estimated that a 1 per cent interest rate cut would lift GDP by 0.3 per cent in the first year and a similar amount in the second.

Although nearly all the money being handed out is expected to be spent by the end of next June, the Government is expected to increase pensions by at least as much as the lump sum payments, which are equivalent to $36 a week for a single pensioner and $52 a week for a married couple.

Treasury is finalising estimates for its mid-year budget update. Although several private forecasters believe the budget will skate close to a deficit both this year and next, the Government is confident that it will remain in the black.

Although capital gains revenue has plummeted, the Government's revenue this year has been boosted by the record iron ore and coal contracts and by the devaluation of the dollar, which together may have boosted the estimated surplus this year by as much as $5 billion before accounting for the new spending package.

ANZ senior economist Mark Rodrigues said the deterioration in the economic outlook had cut the likely budget surplus this year from the $21.9 billion forecast at budget time to no more than $7.3billion now.

"The budget will be very close to balance in 2008-09, with the potential for a movement into deficit," he said.

Morgan Stanley chief economist Gerard Minack said the budget would fall into deficit this year, with a likelihood it would be seriously in deficit in 2009-10 by as much as 2 per cent of GDP.
MALCOLM Turnbull has pledged Opposition support for Kevin Rudd's $10.4 billion economic stimulus package but accused the Government of lifting pensions for expediency rather than compassion.

And the Greens have demanded the Government tie extra assistance for first-home buyers to energy-efficiency measures such as insulation for houses and solar hot-water systems.

After the Prime Minister unveiled his plans for massive spending to buoy the economy in the face of the global financial crisis, the Opposition Leader welcomed the move to provide one-off payments for first-home buyers, pensioners and families.

Mr Turnbull said he had some concerns about the package but would not quibble on details because he believed it represented "very significant economic stimulus".

"We trust that the Government has taken into account advice from Treasury and considered the impact that this stimulus may have on the Reserve Bank's ability to continue reducing interest rates.

"It has our support. It will provide a stimulus to the economy, that's for certain, and above all it gives justice to Australia's aged pensioners in particular."

Mr Turnbull has spent recent weeks demanding the Government increase the single pension rate by $30 a week to provide relief to pensioners struggling with increasing living costs.

But until the collapse of global financial markets over recent days, the Government had refused to act, saying it would await the outcome of a review into the adequacy of pensions to be completed next year.

However, the package announced yesterday included $4.8 billion in payments of $1200 for single pensioners and $2100 for couples. The payments will go to recipients of all types of pensions, not just single age pensioners who would have benefited from the Coalition proposal.

Mr Turnbull said he was pleased that pensioners would finally receive justice.

"It's not something to lament unduly, but it is a fact that the only reason the pensioners have got what they deserved is because the Prime Minister concluded there was a need for a fiscal stimulus.

"What was really needed was not just an injection of additional liquidity into the economy, but an injection of compassion."

In parliament, Mr Rudd ridiculed the Coalition's position on pensions, accusing it of doing nothing to reform the pension system in 12 years of office and proposing relief for only a thin section of the pensioner community to win newspaper headlines.

Nationals leader Warren Truss said the rescue package could not have been delivered without the budget surplus built up by the Howard government.

"Our hard-won gains are now being called upon to shield Australia as it faces a significant downturn in economic activity caused by the global financial crisis," Mr Truss said.

But Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner said the Opposition was playing schoolyard games in claiming it owned the surplus, when, in fact, it was owned by taxpayers.

Greens leader Bob Brown said the Government should attach its extra assistance for first-home buyers, who will receive up to $21,000 in government grants until the end of the financial year, to green housing measures such as retro-fitting homes with insulation and solar hot water systems.

"Greed got the world into this crisis; greenwill get it out of this crisis," Senator Brown said. "We will move in the Senate to make the package greener, job-richer and even better in stimulating local business in Australia."
THE last prime minister to attempt a Keynesian kick-start to the economy along the lines announced yesterday was Paul Keating in 1992.

That says something about the anticipation, or more correctly dread, on where the economy could be headed.

But there are important differences, and they are all in the timing. Sixteen years ago, when Mr Keating unveiled a mini-budget he called "One Nation" (it was six years before the arrival of Pauline Hanson), the economy was in a deep recession, with unemployment above 10per cent and headed for a peak of 11 per cent in 1992-93.

The announcement yesterday is intended as a pre-emptive strike against a recession. Unemployment rose in September but is still at only 4.3 per cent.

A significant rise in the number of jobless is probably already built into the near-term future, given the massive loss of confidence the economy has suffered. But the hope is that early action will forestall anything like the kind of disaster we saw in the early 1990s.

As Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner told parliament yesterday: "Those of us who lived through the previous economic downturn know how quickly (it) can spread, and know how important it is totake decisive action early to ensure that growth and economic activity and employment continue to survive and toprosper."

Like yesterday's announcement, the One Nation package included increases in family and welfare payments, extra funding for skills and job training, and a boost to infrastructure spending.

But much more of the Rudd package has been front-loaded, with more than 90per cent of the spending due this financial year.

The other big difference is on monetary policy. The Reserve Bank has acted earlier in the cycle, and more decisively, to bring down interest rates.

The last time it cut by a full percentage point was in February 1992, the same month as Keating's mini-budget. That still left the standard variable housing rate at 11 per cent.

The biggest misjudgment of the time was keeping interest rates too high for too long. But Tanner had this in mind as well yesterday.

That said, learning the lessons of the past does not mean there will be no mistakes in the future. Pump-priming the economy through the budget largely fell out of fashion in recent decades, partly because of doubts about its effectiveness.

If the economy drops into a big hole, yesterday's measures could still be too little, too late. Spending $10 billion sounds less impressive when set beside a total federal budget this year of $288billion and a total national economy worth $1.2trillion.

But then the Rudd Government is leaving open the option of further action. And no-one was contemplating that nationalisation of the banks, last proposed unsuccessfully by the Chifley Government 60 years ago, would be back on the agenda either.

What pisses me off the most, is that my parents work to hard. We don't get a single penny of this cash because theres a belief in the household of doing an honest days work for an honest days pay. Instead of rewarding hard work, this Labor government rewards every but. We try and save, but get slugged with massive capital gains taxes that practically outstrips the gains after fees, charges and the rate of interest making it almost a waste of time. My dad is a boilermaker/welder and works loads of overtime to provide for the fammily and gets slugged for doing so. My mum works in an office building, working hard to see only wages taxed away by the government and levied into oblivion. "Working families", the useless and meaningless pop term coined by Mr Rudd and his stooge Mr Swan at the Treasury effectivly excludes a vast majority of families who work hard, but rewards those "who qualify" with grants, subsidies and in some cases blantant electoral bribes.
This government has failed to recognize that its not only familieis with children that are "doing it tough" with price rises ect but everyone, but do we get a look in? No. When I was a youngester, did we get lavish child care benefits, or a baby bonus or massivly subsidized child care? Not a damn chance.

What about garanteeing superannuation Mr Rudd? That would be garanteeing peoples long term futures instead of a quick cash injection into limited sectors of the community? But no, Mr Rudd had to be all flash and bang and "decisive action" that would make the dreams of Jim Hacker blush with envy.

Instead of giving a weekly raise to pensions and carers, its a lump sum designed to aparantly care for christmas. Bullshit. A cynical ploy to buy votes under the facade of protecting the economy. Obviously, Mr Rudd refusing to accept the opposition proposals to increase it about three months ago was held off for this.

And if people are relying on the increase in the first home buyer or builder grants, how can they be expected to pay off the large mortgage then? They'll struggle, default and the credit crisis conntinues. If you are having to encourage people, who are borderline unable to afford their own home to buy or build, how can you expect them to be able to afford the morgages?

Yet if my parents worked less, earned less, they could say to Mr Rudd, "look, we're working less, rewards us for it". That however would be morally wrong. For example, the woman who rents next door, who does well for herself well be getting something like over 2000 dollars this christmas simply because she is a single mum with two children. What do we get? Squat.

For the first time I can ever recall, my dad, who has been a trade unionist ever since he began said he would not vote for a Rudd Labor government ever, obviously that means little to everyone else here, but for my dad to say he would not vote Labor, is something I would never, in a million years thought I would here him say. And I understand why, because Mr Rudd simply doesn't care.

Oh, and the run on plasma and LCD televisions has already begun in anticipation of the government cash arriving. Rathering than investing wisely (hey why would you when Capital Gains tax makes it useless!), people buy short term consumer goods that effectivly flush the money down the toilet in christmas spending sprees.

Rant over. Still supremely pissed off at Mr Rudd and his handling of the situatio, for which all intensive purposes, the Australian economy and institutions were already insulated from recession, even if growth did slow down.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top