“Old ones; new ones; loved ones; forgotten ones”

[Lardibutts]

Wasn’t there an old big band leader who always introduced his radio programmes with this thread title catchphrase?

Continuing with the "Debbie" debate, those were interesting replies about systematically going through the old dims library stories and

either rejecting them totally, sending them to the Discard Room if they are incomplete, or migrating them to Recent Additions.

I’ve really enjoyed most of the refurbed oldies, this is probably the first I’ve groaned over.
It appears the only criteria you apply for rejection is total non compliance with the current guidelines (I’ve been reading the "Found something disturbing" thread)

Since all three of us decided “Debbie” was dross, can there not be some other qualitative filter that can avert the time wasting drudgery of refurbing no hopers?

For example could you use the number of hits a story has received over a given time period – this was always the way of managing old style lending libraries.

 

[Risible]

 

[Observer]

 

[Lardibutts]

 

[elroycohen]

 

[Risible]

 

[Lardibutts]

 

[elroycohen]