• Dimensions Magazine is a vibrant community of size acceptance enthusiasts. Our very active members use this community to swap stories, engage in chit-chat, trade photos, plan meetups, interact with models and engage in classifieds.

    Access to Dimensions Magazine is subscription based. Subscriptions are only $29.99/year or $5.99/month to gain access to this great community and unmatched library of knowledge and friendship.

    Click Here to Become a Subscribing Member and Access Dimensions Magazine in Full!

Bigger thighs are better for health

Dimensions Magazine

Help Support Dimensions Magazine:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

FatGirlLover

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 23, 2005
Messages
60
Location
,
http://news.uk.msn.com/odd-news/article.aspx?cp-documentid=149520477&ocid=today

"Men and women with large thighs have a lower risk of premature death and heart disease, a study has shown.
People whose thighs measure at least 23.6in (60cm) in circumference were less likely to develop heart disease or die early, a 12-year study of almost 3,000 men and women in Denmark found.
Professor Berit Heitmann said thigh size could be used by GPs as "an early marker to identify patients at later risk of cardiovascular disease and early mortality".
"A small thigh circumference was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular and coronary heart diseases and total mortality in both men and women," he said.
"A threshold effect for thigh circumference was evident, with greatly increased risk of premature death below around 60cm."
He added: "The fact that more than half of the men and women aged 35-65 have thigh circumference below the threshold is worrying."
The Monica (monitoring trends in and determinants of cardiovascular disease) project, published online on bmj.com, found there was no added protective effect for people with thighs in excess of 60cm.
Body fat and other high risk factors such as smoking and high cholesterol were taken into account by the study.
Prof Heitmann, director of the research unit for dietary studies at Copenhagen University Hospital, said: "The adverse effects of small thighs might be related to too little muscle mass in the region."


At last, a study that shows that being plumper, in some areas at least, is better! :) I adore women with thick thighs and a fat ass, so its time to rejoice! :eat2:

Seriously though, is this not good news for fat people, or is this just the size of thighs so-called average sized people have? What I mean is, will scientists also come out and say that having thighs with a diamater greater than X cm is also bad for you? Personally I think these sort of studies are a load of rubbish, its just as likely you could be fat and healthy as it is that you could be thin and unhealthy. The idea of an obesity 'epidemic' is just insane.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top